First some disclosures; If you were to ask me who makes the best commercially available computers I would say Apple. They make quality machines, no questions about it. But by the same token, If you asked me who overcharges for the machines they make I would have a list of three companies Apple, Sony, Alienware (Dell). I have owned several iPods and an iPhone. I jail-broke my iPhone (I often void warranties), and feel no guilt or shame about it. Lastly I own several Samsung products, not a phone or tablet, but I do own some items.
<Deep Breath>
Some of you may have noticed in the news recently, aside from the political kerfuffles, there has been a lot patent/IP litigation going on. I'm not a IP lawyer (yet) but it really bothers me how companies have decided to use the patent system to wage market share micro-wars. If I understand the system correctly the entire idea behind a patent is as follows - I create some really great way of making a new product, or I create a brand new way to make an old product better that is novel and non-obvious. In exchange for full disclosure on how I made said product I am given a legal monopoly on my new product for x amount of years (I believe the time varies depending on the type of product).
For reasons not pertinent to this writing this is a great system when it works.
Now to Apple.
In the picture below (from Techrepublic) is the Compaq TC1105. Looks familiar doesn't it? Vaguely like a silver version of the original iPad? So why isn't Apple suing Compaq for
Compaq TC1105 |
Picard using the PADD... hmmmmm |
Now Apple has sued everyone under the sun for infringing on a patent and registered designs that was just rejected by the US patent office and they are being a child about losing the cases in the UK (see above). In conclusion could everybody please stop drinking Apples Kool-aid? Or at least slow down? They are just one step from being the little kid who stomps off and pouts when they don't get their way. Grow up Apple.
[someone pointed out that the suit was in regards to a registered design not a patent, but I think the argument still stands, and there is a lot of patent suits going on as well]
[someone pointed out that the suit was in regards to a registered design not a patent, but I think the argument still stands, and there is a lot of patent suits going on as well]